Jurisdiction: United States

California Appellate Court Rejects Narrow Definition of Attorney-Client Privilege With Respect to Documents Contained in Insurer’s Claims Files

In Zurich American Ins. Co. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, et al., No. B194793 (Cal. App., 2nd Dist., Oct. 11, 2007), an appellate panel reversed a lower court’s order and held that the attorney-client privilege extends to communications between an insurer’s employees regarding legal advice and strategy, even if such communications do not contain advice directly from counsel, when disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of that information or to further the purpose of the legal consultation. 

Read More

Louisiana AG Files State Antitrust Suit Against Insurers

On November 8, 2007, Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr. announced that his office filed a petition in New Orleans Civil District Court suit against Allstate Insurance Company, Lafayette Insurance Company, Xactware, Inc., Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC, Insurance Services Office, Inc., State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Standard Fire Insurance Company and McKinsey & Company for alleged violations of the Louisiana Monopolies Act. 

Read More

Federal District Court Holds “Known Loss” Exclusion Does Not Apply to Mold Damage Resulting From Faulty Roof Repair

In Transportation Insurance Company v. The Regency Roofing Companies, Inc., C.A. No. 05-80830 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2007), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently ruled that the “known loss” exclusion in a commercial general liability (“CGL”) policy did not preclude coverage for mold related injuries that arose from the insured’s faulty roof installation and repair. 

Read More

California Court Affirms Multimillion-Dollar Verdict Against Insurer That Failed to Settle Underlying Case for $100,000 Policy Limit

In Encarnacion v. 20th Century Ins. Co., Nos. B179825 & 182737 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 27, 2007), an unreported decision, a California appeals court recently affirmed a multimillion-dollar verdict against an insurer that failed to settle the underlying suit for the $100,000 policy limit. 

Read More

InsurTech

Topics

Archives

Email the Editor

Click here to Email the Editor

Locke Lord LLP

For the latest information about our Firm visit lockelord.com