In October, www.insurereinsure.com reported on a regulation being proposed by New York Superintendent of Insurance Eric Dinallo that would eliminate the existing collateral requirements imposed on foreign and alien reinsurers operating in New York (click here to view prior post). 


Read More Update on New York’s Proposed Change in Collateral Requirements on Foreign and Alien Reinsurers

The New York Court of Appeals denied a motion for rehearing in the Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Insurance Company of New York case, thereby leaving intact its February 2008 decision allowing insureds  to recover “consequential damages” for improper denial of coverage.  The Court’s denial was made without comment. 


Read More New York Court of Appeals Denies Motion for Rehearing Regarding Award of Consequential Damages for Bad Faith Breach of Insurance Contract

A New York federal court recently found that a lawsuit commenced by two insurance companies in run-off, Seaton Insurance Company and Stonewall Insurance Company, against their run-off manager, defendant Cavell USA Inc. and its principal, Ken Randall, was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on that basis. 
Read More New York Federal Court Enforces Forum Selection Clause, Grant’s Run-off Administrator’s Motion to Dismiss

A New York state intermediate appeals court recently upheld the “plain meaning” of a so-called “insured v. insured” exclusion contained in a not-for-profit directors and officers liability policy, but narrowly construed the exclusion. 


Read More New York Appellate Division Affirms Narrow Interpretation of “Insured v. Insured” Exclusion in Not-for-Profit D&O Policy

A New York based radiology practice (the “Plaintiff”) filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against a benefits administration firm, CareCore National, LLC, that provides services for insurers including Aetna, GHI, HIP, Healthnet, Healthfirst, and Oxford. 


Read More New York Radiology Practice Sues Health Care Benefits Administration Firm Contracted With Major Health Care Insurers Alleging Antitrust Violations

For the second time in just over a year, both houses of the New York Legislature passed a bill that would reverse New York’s longstanding “no-prejudice” rule.  Senate Bill 8610 and Assembly Bill 11541 (the “Bill”) prohibits insurers from denying a claim based on late notice unless the insurer can show that it was prejudiced by the untimely notice. 
Read More NY Legislature Passes Late Notice Bill Reversing Longstanding “No-Prejudice” Rule

The legislation listed below is under consideration for inclusion on a future Assembly Insurance Committee agenda. In order to gather input on these bills, all interested parties are invited to offer comments in support or opposition to the bills listed below. Suggestions for proposed language changes are also welcome at this time. 


Read More Requests for Comments on Proposed Legislation from New York State Assembly Committee on Insurance

Last month, www.insurereinsure.com reported on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., No. 06-989 (U.S. Mar. 25, 2008), which held that the grounds set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) for vacating and modifying arbitration awards were “exclusive,” rejecting the notion that parties whose arbitration is governed by the FAA can contractually expand the scope of judicial review of the award beyond the grounds provided by the FAA. 
Read More New York State Court Vacates Portion of Arbitration Award Based on Manifest Disregard of the Law