Coverage & Claims
FDIC Sues IndyMac’s Primary Mortgage Insurer, PMI, Over Coverage for $1.9 Billion in Outstanding Mortgages
SDNY Judge Transfers Coverage Dispute to California Based on Location of Witnesses and Events in the Underlying Action
New York State Court: Insurer Waives Denial Grounds Not Specifically Asserted in its Notice of Disclaimer
A New York state appellate court recently ruled that an insurer waives its right to deny coverage based on any coverage ground not specifically asserted in its denial of coverage letter. …
Read More New York State Court: Insurer Waives Denial Grounds Not Specifically Asserted in its Notice of Disclaimer
Court Ascribes Narrow Meaning to the Term “Claim” Where Not Defined in Claims-Made Policy
…
Read More Court Ascribes Narrow Meaning to the Term “Claim” Where Not Defined in Claims-Made Policy
Fifth Circuit Rejects Excess Insurer’s Temporal and Subject Matter Stacking Arguments
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently rejected an excess insurer’s arguments in favor of temporal and subject matter stacking and affirmed summary judgment dismissing its subrogation claims against certain primary insurers.
Read More Fifth Circuit Rejects Excess Insurer’s Temporal and Subject Matter Stacking Arguments
Florida Federal Court: Appraiser’s Finding That Insurer’s Calculation of Loss Was Too Low Is Insufficient to Support Statutory Bad Faith Claim
UK: Further Support for Scottish Pleural Plaques Bill
On 26 June 2008 we reported that the Scottish Parliament had proposed a bill to reinstate compensation for individuals who have pleural plaques, thereby reversing in Scotland the effect of the House of Lord’s decision in Johnston v NEI International Combustion. The Justice Committee of the Scottish Parliament have now issued their report regarding the Bill. …
Read More UK: Further Support for Scottish Pleural Plaques Bill
Illinois Federal Court: “Related Wrongful Acts” Provision Applies Only To Limits Of Liability And Does Not Limit Duty To Defend
A federal district court in Illinois recently held that a “related wrongful acts” provision did not affect an insurer’s duty to defend even though the “wrongful acts” in question indisputedly “related” to wrongful acts that occurred prior to the policy’s retroactive date. …
Read More Illinois Federal Court: “Related Wrongful Acts” Provision Applies Only To Limits Of Liability And Does Not Limit Duty To Defend