NCOIL Adopts a Resolution in Support of State-Based Regulation of the Use of Credit Scores in Personal Insurance Rating
BREAKING NEWS: New York Governor Patterson Signs Law Reversing New York’s “No-Prejudice” Precedent, Requiring That an Insurer Has Sustained “Material Prejudice” Before Disclaiming Coverage on Late Notice Grounds
The End of Countersignature Laws in the United States
The state of Nevada’s failure to challenge a recent decision by a federal appellate court deeming that state’s “countersignature laws” unconstitutional officially marks the end of countersignature requirements for brokers placing business in the United States. …
Read More The End of Countersignature Laws in the United States
Court of Appeals Denies Cedent’s Motion to Appeal Ruling That Reinsurer Not Obligated to Follow Settlement Allocation
New England Patriots Face Auction Rate Securities Crunch
…
Read More New England Patriots Face Auction Rate Securities Crunch
UBS Agrees To Buy Back Up To $3.5 Billion Of Auction Rate Preferred Shares
…
Read More UBS Agrees To Buy Back Up To $3.5 Billion Of Auction Rate Preferred Shares
Court Vacates Arbitration Awards Because Arbitrators Improperly Assumed Jurisdiction
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. United States, No. CV-06-5020-FVS (E.D. Wash. Mar. 10, 2008), the court vacated several arbitration awards on the grounds that the reinsurer was not bound by the arbitration agreement in contracts between the ceding company and its insureds, and the arbitrators did not have jurisdiction to preside over the disputes between the parties. …
Read More Court Vacates Arbitration Awards Because Arbitrators Improperly Assumed Jurisdiction
Post Hall Street, Federal Courts Differ On the Application of Manifest Disregard of the Law
Over the last few months, www.insurereinsure.com has reported on the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396 (2008) (click here to view previous post), which held that parties could not contract to expand the grounds for vacatur or modification of arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), and the potential impact its holding might have on the doctrine of manifest disregard of the law (click here to view previous post). …
Read More Post Hall Street, Federal Courts Differ On the Application of Manifest Disregard of the Law
UPDATE: House Committees Approve Three Federal Insurance Regulation Bills
…
Read More UPDATE: House Committees Approve Three Federal Insurance Regulation Bills