On March 7, 2013, the Florida Senate Banking and Insurance Committee approved SPB 7018 (the “Bill”) by a vote of 11-1. The Bill, if enacted, would make several changes to Florida’s property insurance laws. 
Read More Florida Senate Committee Approves Bill with Sweeping Changes to Property Insurance Laws

In comments made yesterday to the Institute of International Bankers conference in Washington, U.S. Treasury undersecretary for domestic finance, Mary J. Miller said she expected FSOC to vote on designation of some companies as systemically important and therefore subject to Federal Reserve oversight “in the next few months.” 
Read More SIFI Designations Expected in the Next Few Months

During the NAIC 2012 Fall National Meeting, a proposal to amend the NAIC’s Stop Loss Insurance Model Act to increase the minimum individual attachment point – the equivalent of a “deductible” – for stop loss insurance from $20,000 to $60,000, as well as changes to aggregate attachment points, was defeated by a 10-8 vote. 
Read More NAIC Defers Action on Stop Loss Insurance Attachment Points; Some States Begin Increases

In Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Limited v Financial Services Authority [2013] UKSC 7, the Supreme Court unanimously held that extended warranty contracts covering satellite television equipment were contracts of insurance. It was therefore found that Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Limited (the Appellant) was carrying out regulated activities that required FSA authorisation. 
Read More UK: Supreme Court Finds That Extended Warranty Contracts are Contracts of Insurance

According to industry reports, an official at the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has indicated that it looks favorably upon companies that implement programs to ensure compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), an act designed to prevent corporate corruption and bribery with respect to business outside the US. 
Read More DOJ Official Indicates That Companies May Avoid FCPA Prosecutions if They Implement Compliance Programs

In recent years, California has sought to establish disincentives for insurance companies to invest in certain sectors of the Iranian industry. However, in early 2012, following challenges to its authority to require divestment, the California Insurance Department (the “Department”) entered into a settlement and agreed not to bar insurers from investments in companies doing business with Iran. 
Read More California Continues to Publicize Insurers Involved in Iranian Investments