In Dunlop Haywards (DHL) and Erinaceous Commercial Property Services Limited v Erinaceous Insurance Services Limited, Lockton Companies International Limited and MSI Corporate Capital Limited and others [2009] EWCA Civ 354, the Appellant insurance broker (Erinaceous Insurance) appealed against a decision of the High Court (see previous blog post) not to allow the Respondent excess insurers to be joined as defendants in a claim brought against the Appellant by its client insured, Dunlop. 


Read More UK: Role of Excess Insurers in Proceedings Between Insured, Broker and Sub-Broker

City lawyer, Patrick Raggett, has been allowed to proceed with his claim against the governors of a Jesuit run school he attended. He is claiming £5 million in damages (a record amount) for sexual abuse suffered in the 1970s at the hands of a now deceased priest at the school before it closed in 1978. 


Read More UK: City Lawyer Sues Governors of Jesuit School for £5m Alleging Sexual Abuse

A Mississippi Federal Court recently refused to remand a case after concluding that the plaintiff improperly joined two insurance agents to a lawsuit to destroy diversity jurisdiction. 
Read More Mississippi Federal Court Dismisses Claims Against Insurance Agents Upon Finding They Were Brought To Destroy Diversity

Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge is delighted to announce that it will again this year host a half-day seminar which will be repeated in Bermuda, New York and Boston. 
Read More Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge Half-day CLE Insurance & Reinsurance Seminars – June 2009

In an insurance coverage action filed recently in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, an insured seeks an order directing its D&O insurer to pay defense costs and indemnify it, if it is found liable, in an action brought by a former director. 


Read More North Carolina Federal Court: Insured Asks Federal Court to Rule on Whether D&O Insurer Should Cover Its Defense Costs and Indemnification in Suit by Former Director

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer, holding that the limit of liability in a directors and officers liability policy was limited to $10 million in the aggregate, as opposed to per claim, even though certain policy documents did not include the word “aggregate” when referring to the limit of liability. 


Read More Pennsylvania Superior Court Affirms Decision in Favor of Insurer Regarding Whether D&O Policy’s Limit of Liability Applied in the Aggregate or Per Claim

A New York trial court recently denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s claim of consequential/extra-contractual damages for pain and suffering and held that the insured may proceed with discovery to explore whether the insurer’s denial of benefits violated the duty of good faith and fair dealing. 
Read More NY Court Extends Availability of Consequential Damages to No-Fault Insurance Cases

In IMT Shipping & Chartering GMBH v Chansung Shipping Co Ltd, owners of Zenovia [2009] EWHC 739 (Comm), the appellant time charterer appealed against the decision of arbitrators concerning the status and effect of a notice of approximate redelivery date given by the charterer to the respondent ship owners. 
Read More UK: Notice of Approximate Redelivery Date by Time Charterer Does Not Give Rise to Promissory Estoppel and Prevent Subsequent Change