Read More Alabama Jury Hears State’s First Wind Versus Water Trial
Mississippi and Louisiana are not the only states to be affected by Hurricane Katrina and last week, an Alabama jury heard its first Katrina-related wind versus water insurance case.
Ninth Circuit Finds Two Class-Actions Are Interrelated Wrongful Acts
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Posted in Coverage & Claims, United States
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that two separate class-action lawsuits, filed during different policy periods by different plaintiffs in different forums (as well as under two different legal theories), are Interrelated Wrongful Acts and subject to one policy limit.
…
Read More Ninth Circuit Finds Two Class-Actions Are Interrelated Wrongful Acts
Environmental Claims – Florida Appellate Court Enforces New York Forum Selection Clause in Petroleum Discharge Case
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In a recent decision, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal enforced an express New York choice of law/forum selection provision in an environmental liability policy insuring a gas station located in Florida. …
Read More Environmental Claims – Florida Appellate Court Enforces New York Forum Selection Clause in Petroleum Discharge Case
U.S. House to Review Homeowners’ Defense Act of 2007
At the top of the United States House of Representatives agenda when it reconvenes in September is a review of the “Homeowners’ Defense Act of 2007” (H.R. 3355 or the “Act”), a bill introduced on August 3, 2007 by Reps. Robert Klein and Tim Mahoney of Florida.
…
Read More U.S. House to Review Homeowners’ Defense Act of 2007
Subprime Lending Crisis Could Impact D&O Insurers
Although there has been a recent slowdown in D&O claims, it appears that D&O insurers may soon be hit with a new wave of claims arising out of the subprime lending crisis. To date, twelve securities class actions have been filed against mortgage lenders.
…
Read More Subprime Lending Crisis Could Impact D&O Insurers
Southern District of New York Denies Summary Judgment to Cedent in Case Involving 3M Settlement
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Clearwater Ins. Co., 04-CV-5023 (S.D.N.Y., July 21, 2007), the Southern District of New York denied a cedent’s motion for summary judgment based on the follow the fortunes doctrine, finding that a material issue of fact existed as to whether a portion of a settlement involved payment for consequential damages claims that would be excluded under the reinsurance certificate at issue.
New Insurance for NASCAR Fans
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Posted in Industry Developments, United States
Sports fans learn to assume certain risks when purchasing advance tickets for sporting events. Uncontrollable events often make it impossible for ticket holders to attend specific events, often leading to the forfeiture of high-priced tickets.
Bear Stearns Hires Law Firm To Investigate Ailing Hedge Fund Investments While Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund Receives $3 Billion Bailout
Last week, Bear Stearns & Co. announced that it has hired a law firm to investigate losses incurred by two of its hedge funds. The hedge funds were forced into bankruptcy after losing significant amounts of money from investments in the subprime mortgage market. The stock market is currently reeling over credit problems stemming from the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage industry.
Met Life and Bancorp Fight Over Insurance-Related Patents
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Posted in IP Developments, United States
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and Bancorp Services LLC are back in the ring again. Bancorp has filed a complaint alleging that MetLife is infringing a patent for a system that administers and tracks the values of insurance policies in separate accounts (U.S. Patent No. 7,249,037).
…
Read More Met Life and Bancorp Fight Over Insurance-Related Patents
Massachusetts Court Weighs In On Duty To Defend Issues
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
A Massachusetts trial court recently ruled on a number of issues concerning an insurer’s duties where it agrees to defend an insured under a reservation of rights, including: (1) an insurer’s duty to defend an affiliated company that owns all of the insured’s shares when only the affiliated company and not the insured is named as a defendant in the lawsuit; (2) an insurer’s duty to pay defense costs for legal work that benefits both the insured and non-insured entities working together as part of a joint defense agreement; (3) an insurer’s duty to pay defense costs for both national and local counsel retained by an insured; and (4) the reasonableness of legal fees incurred when the defense is provided under a reservation of rights.
…
Read More Massachusetts Court Weighs In On Duty To Defend Issues