The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted an insurer’s motion to intervene in an indemnity dispute between another insurer and an asbestos product supplier. 
Read More California Federal Court: Second Insurer With Interest In Outcome Of Coverage Litigation Has Right To Intervene

In a recent decision, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal enforced an express New York choice of law/forum selection provision in an environmental liability policy insuring a gas station located in Florida. 
Read More Environmental Claims – Florida Appellate Court Enforces New York Forum Selection Clause in Petroleum Discharge Case

On July 17, 2007, New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) Andrew M. Cuomo filed suit against the ExxonMobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company “to force the cleanup of a 17-million-gallon oil spill in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, and to restore Newtown Creek, the contaminated waterway separating Queens from Brooklyn.”  


Read More NYAG Sues ExxonMobil over Alleged 17-million-gallon Oil Spill in New York City

The Travelers Companies, Inc. has announced a settlement with ACandS Inc. to resolve all current and future asbestos-related coverage claims.  ACandS, an insulation contractor, has been undergoing Chapter 11 reorganization since 2002, and its bankruptcy counsel has described the Travelers insurance coverage as “the most important asset of ACandS’s bankruptcy estate.” 


Read More Travelers Enters Settlement with ACandS, Ending “Potentially Unlimited” Exposure; Plan Includes Reinsurance Allocation

On May 30, the U.S Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that an insured’s broad allegations of pollution over a course of decades are enough to trigger a liability insurer’s duty to defend environmental contamination lawsuits. 


Read More First Circuit Finds Flexibility in “Sudden and Accidental” Pollution Exception