Topic: Solvency II

CEIOPS has published an issues paper on the supervisory review process and undertakings’ reporting requirements under Solvency II. (See: Issues Paper) The issues paper covers some of the main components of Pillar II (concerning the way supervisors conduct their reviews) and Pillar III (supervisory reporting and public disclosure) elements of the Solvency II regime. 

On 10 June 2008, the CEA issued a press release stating that it believed that failure to adopt a risk-based approach to the calculation of the MCR would perpetuate the disadvantages of the current regulatory system, Solvency I. Michaela Koller, director general of the CEA, said that, “Approaches to calculating the MCR that are not consistent with the overall system could jeopardise the effectiveness of the whole Solvency II regime” and called for the MCR to be linked to the solvency capital (SCR) requirement so that both reflect the true risk profile of the insurer. The CEA suggested that the MCR should be calculated as a percentage of the SCR. 

On 28 May the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) published two Papers of final advice to the European Commission for the Solvency II project, entitled “Advice to the European Commission on aspects of the Framework Directive Proposal related to Insurance Groups” and “Advice to the European Commission on the Principle of Proportionality in the Solvency II Framework Directive Proposal”.