Read More Court Rules That Four Separate Panels Must Resolve Arbitration Consolidation Issues
Reinsurance
Recently, in Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Century Indemnity Co., No. 05-5355 (E.D. Pa. September 5, 2007), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was asked to determine which of four arbitration panels should decide the question of whether individual arbitration proceedings should be consolidated.
NAIC Seeks Comment on Proposal to Modify Reinsurer Rules
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
As outlined in our June 7, 2007 blog entry, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is considering modernizing reinsurance regulation, including collateral requirements of nonadmitted reinsurers.
…
Read More NAIC Seeks Comment on Proposal to Modify Reinsurer Rules
California Supreme Court Finds Reinsurance Information Outside the Scope of Discovery Rules
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Recently, the California Supreme Court held that the alleged victims of child abuse by certain priests in the Catholic Church will not have access to the reinsurance information of the defendant Church’s nonparty liability insurers in the course of discovery.
Subprime Lending Unlikely to Impact Reinsurance Sector: Rating Agency
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
According to a recent report from credit rating agency Fitch Ratings, subprime lending exposure is not expected to present a significant rating issue for the reinsurance sector. Noting that reinsurers typically seek to generate underwriting income rather than spread-based income, Fitch observes that most reinsurers have avoided heavy investments in subprime mortgage-backed securities.
…
Read More Subprime Lending Unlikely to Impact Reinsurance Sector: Rating Agency
Connecticut State Court Rules That Service On Designated Agents For Process Sufficient And Orders Hearing On Amount Of Prepleading Security To Be Posted
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
On remand for further proceedings from the Connecticut Supreme Court, the Appellate Court of Connecticut recently agreed with plaintiffs Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and thirteen of its affiliates’ statutory interpretation of Connecticut General Statutes § 38a-27, holding that the plaintiffs are entitled to prepleading security from defendants Ace American Reinsurance Company and various other foreign reinsurance companies.
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements to be Decided by Tenth Circuit
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
The Reinsurance Association of American (“RAA”) recently joined a reinsurer in urging the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to overturn a decision of the Northern District of Oklahoma that held that Oklahoma’s Uniform Arbitration Act (the “Oklahoma Act”) prohibits arbitration agreements in reinsurance contracts.
…
Read More Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements to be Decided by Tenth Circuit
Southern District of New York Denies Summary Judgment to Cedent in Case Involving 3M Settlement
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Clearwater Ins. Co., 04-CV-5023 (S.D.N.Y., July 21, 2007), the Southern District of New York denied a cedent’s motion for summary judgment based on the follow the fortunes doctrine, finding that a material issue of fact existed as to whether a portion of a settlement involved payment for consequential damages claims that would be excluded under the reinsurance certificate at issue.
Florida District Court Refuses to Imply Follow the Fortunes in Reinsurance Contract
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In a recent decision analyzing the follow the fortunes doctrine, a federal district court in Florida held that the doctrine should not be implied in a reinsurance contract.
…
Read More Florida District Court Refuses to Imply Follow the Fortunes in Reinsurance Contract
Federal District Court in Connecticut Appoints Umpire in Reinsurance Arbitration
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In a dispute concerning the appointment of an umpire in a reinsurance arbitration, the federal district court of Connecticut held that it, and not the parties, should appoint the umpire and appointed Robert M. Hall to serve on the arbitration panel.
…
Read More Federal District Court in Connecticut Appoints Umpire in Reinsurance Arbitration
Beneficiary of Surety Bond Lacks Standing to Assert a Direct Action Against Reinsurer
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In Jurupa Valley Spectrum, LLC v. National Indem. Co., et al., 06 Civ. 4023 (S.D.N.Y., June 29, 2007), the Southern District of New York examined whether a beneficiary of surety bonds had standing to bring a cause of action for bond payments against the reinsurer of a bond issuer.
…
Read More Beneficiary of Surety Bond Lacks Standing to Assert a Direct Action Against Reinsurer