In a recent decision originating from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on remand from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the court held that (i) there was no basis for finding that joint liquidators for a Bermuda insurer were deficient or engaged in any misconduct, or that their actions resulted in any prejudice to reinsurer Commercial Union and (ii) that vacating the underlying arbitration award and granting injunctive relief would confer an undeserved benefit on Commercial Union.
Read More Federal Court Rules That Reinsurer Was Not Prejudiced By Redomestication of Insurer Carried Out Through Deceit
Reinsurance
Insolvent Insurer Ordered to Produce Documents Related to its Reinsurance
…
Read More Insolvent Insurer Ordered to Produce Documents Related to its Reinsurance
Chile Considers Legislation To Modernize Its Insurance and Reinsurance Laws
…
Read More Chile Considers Legislation To Modernize Its Insurance and Reinsurance Laws
UK: Court Considers Application for Stay in Favour of Texas Arbitration
…
Read More UK: Court Considers Application for Stay in Favour of Texas Arbitration
Court of Appeals Denies Cedent’s Motion to Appeal Ruling That Reinsurer Not Obligated to Follow Settlement Allocation
Court Vacates Arbitration Awards Because Arbitrators Improperly Assumed Jurisdiction
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. United States, No. CV-06-5020-FVS (E.D. Wash. Mar. 10, 2008), the court vacated several arbitration awards on the grounds that the reinsurer was not bound by the arbitration agreement in contracts between the ceding company and its insureds, and the arbitrators did not have jurisdiction to preside over the disputes between the parties. …
Read More Court Vacates Arbitration Awards Because Arbitrators Improperly Assumed Jurisdiction
Post Hall Street, Federal Courts Differ On the Application of Manifest Disregard of the Law
Over the last few months, www.insurereinsure.com has reported on the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396 (2008) (click here to view previous post), which held that parties could not contract to expand the grounds for vacatur or modification of arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), and the potential impact its holding might have on the doctrine of manifest disregard of the law (click here to view previous post). …
Read More Post Hall Street, Federal Courts Differ On the Application of Manifest Disregard of the Law
Brazil Issues New Regulations Governing Maximum Cession Levels To Occasional Reinsurers
Brazil’s insurance regulator, the Superintendency of Private Insurance (SUSEP), recently issued regulations establishing that cessions to occasional reinsurers (see definition below) by Brazilian insurers may not exceed 10% of the total premiums ceded to reinsurers. The new regulations further establish that no Brazilian insurer may cede more than 50% of the risk it underwrites to occasional reinsurers. The moves were not unexpected, having been foreshadowed in SUSEP’s discussions with the industry. …
Read More Brazil Issues New Regulations Governing Maximum Cession Levels To Occasional Reinsurers
Arbitration: Second Circuit Finds That Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Is Not Appealable
…
Read More Arbitration: Second Circuit Finds That Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Is Not Appealable