The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued its opinion in Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., a case that both the reinsurance and general arbitration communities have been following closely. In a unanimous opinion, the Seventh Circuit reversed the District Court’s decision to hold that a party-appointed arbitrator’s prior involvement in an earlier arbitration between the parties did not disqualify him or render him incapable of serving in a subsequent arbitration involving related issues.
Illinois Developments
Illinois Federal Court Rules that Reinsurer’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award is Untimely Under the Federal Arbitration Act
R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. American Motorist Ins. Co., involved a dispute arising under a series of reinsurance treaties entered into by the parties. Pursuant to the arbitration clauses in the treaties, their dispute was heard by a panel of arbitrators, which issued its “Final Award” on February 5, 2010. …
FEATURED POST: ARS Derivative Suits Will Need To Overcome Business Judgment Rule
In the past few months, several derivative suits against mutual fund issuers of auction rate securities (ARS) have hit the courts. …
Federal Court Orders Party to Produce Copies of its Reinsurance Agreements Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26
Plaintiff moved to compel production of defendant American Red Cross’ reinsurance agreements. Defendant objected on the grounds that it was self-insured up to $1 million, and, in its counsel’s opinion, any judgment in the action would not exceed that amount. …
Contingent Commissions Allowed for “Big Three” Insurance Brokers in New York, Illinois and Connecticut
…
U.S. District Court Grants Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Finding No Coverage Where the Underlying Complaint Alleged Solely Intentional Conduct
…
Illinois Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal of Derivative Action Against Aon
An Illinois appeals court recently upheld the trial court’s dismissal of a derivative action brought against Aon based upon its alleged practice of collecting “contingent commissions.” …
Plaintiffs Prevail in Rare Securities Class Action Verdict
On May 7, 2009, a jury in the Northern District of Illinois reached a mixed verdict finding in plaintiffs’ favor on several counts in the Household International securities fraud class action. The trial will now move on to the damages phase. Prior to this verdict, only six other securities class actions that involve conduct after the passage of the PSLRA in 1995, have been tried to a verdict. …
Federal Court Rules that Bad Faith Claim Falls Within Scope of Arbitration Clause in D&O Policy
An Illinois federal court recently held that an insured’s bad faith claim fell within the scope of an arbitration provision contained in a D&O Policy and therefore granted the insurer’s motion to compel arbitration. …
Federal Court in Illinois Grants Judgment on the Pleadings in Legionnaire’s Disease Coverage Suit Based On Insureds’ Lack of Denial That Policy Contained Bacteria Exclusion
…