Excess and Surplus Lines

Subscribe to Excess and Surplus Lines via RSS

Just because a series of merger documents assert something to be true does not necessarily make it so, particularly when it comes to insurance coverage.  That was the lesson an excess-layer D&O carrier learned when it attempted to assert insured-versus-insured and fraud exclusions to defeat a claim to policy proceeds by the purchaser of a corporation in Wojtunik v. Kealy, No. 03-cv-02161 (D.Ariz. Mar. 31, 2011).  A copy of the court’s decision is available here. …
Read More Arizona Federal Court Permits Garnishment From Defunct Company’s D&O Insurers

The New York Appellate Division for the First Department recently reversed a decision of a lower court that had granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, an excess insurer, on a count of insurance bad faith against a primary insurer. Federal Ins. Co. v. North Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. et al., Docket No. 603926/05 (N.Y.A.D., 1st Dep’t, April 5, 2011). …
Read More New York Appellate Court Reverses Judgment of Insurance Bad Faith and Remands for Additional Fact-finding

On April 18, 2011, the Superintendent of the New York Insurance Department promulgated the twelfth amendment to Regulation 41 (the “Amendment”).  Pursuant to the Amendment, excess lines insurers obtaining eligibility in New York on or after January 1, 2011 must maintain surplus to policyholders of at least $45,000,000, instead of $15,000,000. …
Read More New York Officially Increases Minimum Surplus Requirement for Excess Lines Insurers

Richard Bouhan, Executive Director of the National Association of Professional Surplus Lines Offices (NAPSLO), recently stated that the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) is attempting to undercut the surplus lines reforms in the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act (the “Act”), which becomes effective on July 21, 2011. …
Read More NAPSLO Questions NAIC ‘s Handling of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act

Unlike other several other states as we reported here, New York has enacted legislation as part of its budget bill that does not authorize the state to enter into the Surplus Lines Insurance Multi-State Compliance Compact (“SLIMPACT”), or any other surplus lines tax allocation compact.  SLIMPACT is an interstate compact that is designed to, among other things, allow for the adoption of uniform standards across participating compact states and uniform tax allocation formulas on multi-state risks. …
Read More New York Rejects SLIMPACT

A Massachusetts federal judge has found that violations of a fee-sharing agreement between a lawyer and his former firm do not constitute legal services, and therefore do not fall within the scope of coverage afforded by the lawyer’s professional malpractice policy.
Read More Fee Dispute Between Lawyer and Former Firm Not Covered by E&O Policy

This updates our May 13, 2010 blog posting.  Last month, the New Jersey legislature passed the “Reinsurance and Surplus Lines Stimulus and Enhancement Act” (A2670, the “Act”).  The Act amends state law to permit surplus lines insurers domiciled in New Jersey to write surplus lines insurance in the state.  This would make New Jersey the second state in the U.S. after Illinois to allow its domestic surplus lines companies to write insurance in the home state’s surplus lines market. …
Read More New Jersey Passes Legislation to Ease Restrictions on Surplus Lines and Credit for Reinsurance