A Massachusetts state trial court recently ruled that, even though an insured’s contractual coverage claim against its insurer was time-barred, its claim for insurer bad faith could proceed under a separate statutory limitations period. 


Read More Massachusetts State Court: Insured May Proceed With Bad Faith Claim Even Though Statute of Limitations On Breach of Contract Claim Has Run

A California federal court recently dismissed breach of contract and bad faith claims based upon certain excess insurers’ failure to fund a purportedly reasonable settlement, holding that an excess judgment or settlement is a prerequisite to such a claim. 


Read More California Federal Court: Bad Faith and Breach of Duty to Settle Claim Against Excess Insurers Not Ripe Until Final Settlement Reached or Judgment Entered In Excess of Primary Policy Limits

In a recent decision (click here), New York’s highest court weighed in on a long-standing debate over an insurance policy’s requirement that insureds obtain their insurers’ consent before settling a claim made against an insured. 
Read More Insured’s Breach of Consent Provision Precludes Coverage for Settlement

Brit Syndicates Ltd v Grant Thornton International UKHL 18 concerned an appeal by the insured, GTI, against a Court of Appeal decision in favour of its insurers. 
Read More The UK House of Lords has overturned a Court of Appeal decision as to whether the avoidance of a composite policy in respect of one party negates another party’s cover

The Missouri Court of Appeals recently affirmed an $8 million punitive damages award against an insurer in a breach of contract, malicious prosecution, and punitive damages action arising from a denied automobile insurance claim valued at $10,300. 


Read More Missouri Court of Appeals Upholds $8 Million Punitive Damages Award Against Insurer In Case Arising From $10,300 Auto Claim

The Claimant in Kosmar Villa Holidays plc v Trustees of Syndicate 1243 [2008] EWCA Civ 147 was a tour operator who had a public liability policy with the Defendant’s predecessor, Euclidian Direct Limited (Euclidian). 
Read More English Court of Appeal Considers the Effect of a Notice Clause in a Public Liability Policy

A Massachusetts trial court recently held that an insurer must pay the attorneys’ fees incurred by its insured in the successful defense of a duty to defend declaratory coverage action brought by the insurer. 
Read More Gamache Exception Extended: Massachusetts Trial Court Orders Insurer To Pay Insured’s Attorneys’ Fees In Unsuccessful Duty to Defend Declaratory Judgment Action

The issue in Qayyum Ansari v New India Assurance Limited [2008] EWHC 243 was whether, when a sprinkler system had been turned off prior to a fire, there had been a material change in cover in the facts stated in a proposal form so as to bring into effect a termination of cover. 
Read More The English High Court Has Ruled on the Proper Construction of a Condition Dealing with Increase of Risk