Topic: Asbestos

The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision). 

As previously reported here, employers’ liability insurers have sought to challenge the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the Act) which permits those suffering with pleural plaques to claim compensation in Scotland. 

The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Sienkiewicz v Greif. The UK’s highest appeal court was reviewing the application of the “Fairchild exception” to single rather than multiple exposure cases. We reported on the Court of Appeal decision here. 

The Court of Appeal has handed down its long-awaited decision in the appeal of the Employers’ Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation. In a long and complex judgment, which runs to more than 100 pages, the Court of Appeal has overturned the main finding of the first instance decision (the judgment of Burton J of November 2008).