A federal district court judge in Florida recently ruled that an insurer cannot retroactively rescind a liability policy insuring underground storage tanks (“USTs”) for an alleged material misrepresentation in the policy application. Rather, the only remedy for such a misrepresentation is the denial of coverage for future claims.
Read More Federal Judge in Florida Rules Underground Storage Tank Policy Cannot Be Rescinded
California District Court Rules That “Duty to Defend” Exists When There Is a “Potential” for Coverage
Florida Federal Court Finds Duty to Defend and Indemnify Mold-Related Claims Despite Policy’s Mold Exclusion and Anti-Concurrent-Cause Provision
New Hampshire Supreme Court Considers Offset Issue in the Home Insurance Company Liquidation
Chair of New York’s Assembly Insurance Committee Speaks at IFNY Event
…
Read More Chair of New York’s Assembly Insurance Committee Speaks at IFNY Event
Minnesota Enacts Bad Faith Legislation
On April 18, Minnesota Governor Tom Pawlenty signed into law S.F. 2822, which allows consumers to sue their insurance companies over denied claims, but caps damages and attorney fees. …
Read More Minnesota Enacts Bad Faith Legislation
NAIC to Complete Reinsurance Regulatory Framework by the end of 2008
…
Read More NAIC to Complete Reinsurance Regulatory Framework by the end of 2008
UK: Regulatory: Treasury and Financial Services Authority (FSA) Launch Consultation on EU Insurance Sector
The Future of Micro-Insurance Regulation in South Africa
The South African National Treasury has released a discussion paper setting out proposals for a new regulatory framework for companies offering insurance products to low-income earners. The proposals relate to the provision of micro-insurance which is any insurance product targeted at, or accessible to, low-income households. …
Read More The Future of Micro-Insurance Regulation in South Africa
Virginia Federal Court Rules that Punitive Damages Are Unavailable in Insurance Bad Faith Case
A federal district court in Virginia recently ruled that under Virginia law, an insured may not recover punitive damages in connection with a bad faith claim against its insurer. TIG Insurance Co. v. Alfa Laval, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:07CV683 (E.D.Va., March 5, 2008). The court explained that under Virginia law, a bad faith action against an insurer is a contract action, not an independent, willful tort for which punitive damages might be appropriate. …
Read More Virginia Federal Court Rules that Punitive Damages Are Unavailable in Insurance Bad Faith Case