The decision in Re Scottish Lion Insurance Company Limited [2009] CSOH 127 concerned a preliminary hearing on two specific issues relating to the sanction of a solvent scheme of arrangement proposed by Scottish Lion Insurance Company Limited. A full sanction hearing is scheduled for January 2010.
New Compensation Disclosure Requirements Proposed for New York Insurance Producers
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
After months of discussion with industry and consumer groups, the New York Insurance Department (the “Department”) released yesterday proposed regulations creating an obligation on the part of insurers to disclose information about producer compensation to purchasers.
…
Read More New Compensation Disclosure Requirements Proposed for New York Insurance Producers
Brazilian Market Shows Microinsurance Promise, But Regulation Lags Behind
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Posted in Latin American Developments, United States
Brazil’s insurance regulator, SUSEP, recently indicated that the timeline for microinsurance legislation has been further extended. Almost to the day, yet another study was released, this time by the Brazilian economic analysis firm FGV, indicating a vast potential for microinsurance sales in the Brazilian market.
…
Read More Brazilian Market Shows Microinsurance Promise, But Regulation Lags Behind
Connecticut Trial Court Awards Judgment in Favor of Insured and Rejects Insurer’s Theory That Insured’s Lack of Income Was Motive For Loss Where Insured Had Other Assets
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
A Connecticut trial court recently awarded judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of an insured who sought coverage from her insurance company for her vehicle after it was stolen and destroyed by fire.
Trust Beneficiary Has Standing To Sue Life Insurance Carrier To Collect Policy Benefits
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin recently held that a beneficiary of a trust has standing to sue the life insurance carrier to collect policy benefits on an accidental death policy.
…
Read More Trust Beneficiary Has Standing To Sue Life Insurance Carrier To Collect Policy Benefits
Restatement of European Insurance Contract Law
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
British Insurance Law Association (BILA) at which members of the Restatement of European Insurance Law Project Group presented the public launch of the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL).
New York Reduces Director Requirements For Domestic Insurers
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
As of August 12 2009, in accordance with Chapter 293 of the Laws of New York 2009, the minimum number of directors required for New York domestic insurers has been reduced from thirteen to seven, and the minimum number of New York resident directors required for domestic insurers has been reduced from two to one.
…
Read More New York Reduces Director Requirements For Domestic Insurers
House Passes Surplus Lines and Reinsurance Reform Bill
On September 9, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Non-admitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2009, H.R. 2571 (the “NRRA”), marking the third time the House has passed a version of the NRRA.
…
Read More House Passes Surplus Lines and Reinsurance Reform Bill
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment In Favor of Contractor’s Insurers, Finding No Bad Faith
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
In Fidelity & Deposit Co., et al. v. Douglas Asphalt Co., et al., No. 09-10919 (11th Cir. Jul. 28, 2009), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment in favor of the insurers, who sought to recover from their insured payments made under payment and performance bonds when the insured allegedly defaulted and failed to complete a project.
…
Read More Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment In Favor of Contractor’s Insurers, Finding No Bad Faith
Federal Court Rules that Arbitration Award Satisfied Final Adjudication Requirement in Intentional Acts and Personal Profit Exclusions
By Troutman Pepper Locke on
Posted in D&O Liability, United States
Earlier this summer, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division held that an arbitrator’s determination in an underlying claim triggered the intentional acts and personal profit exclusions in both a D&O and E&O policy. The Court held that the arbitrator’s conclusions not only established the excluded behavior as a matter of fact, but also satisfied the D&O policy’s final adjudication requirement. The Court then concluded that the insured was required to reimburse defense costs paid by both the D&O and E&O insurers.