On March 14, 2013, the NAIC’s Captive and Special Purpose Vehicle Use (E) Subgroup (the “Subgroup”) released a revised version of its White Paper with respect to Special Purposes Vehicles (“SPVs”) and Captives (the “New Draft”). The New Draft is now open for a public comment period until April 28, 2013. 
Read More NAIC Subgroup’s White Paper on Captives and SPVs

Earlier this week Federico Buenrostro, who headed the influential California Public Employees’ Retirement System from 2002 through 2008, was indicted by a federal grand jury on fraud charges stemming from his involvement in falsifying documents as part of a “pay-to-play” scheme at the pension fund. The indictment is the result of a four year investigation by the SEC, the FBI, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. 
Read More Indictment of Former CalPERS Head Puts Spotlight Back on Placement Agents and Private Equity Firms

A New York appellate court recently held that an insurer’s liability for certain underlying lead paint claims was limited to a single per-occurrence limit, enforcing a policy’s noncumulation clause and finding that the claims arose from the same occurrence. See Nesmith, et al. v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 12-00182 (4th Dep’t Feb. 1, 2013). 
Read More New York State Court Enforces Policy’s Noncumulation Clause and Finds That Multiple Lead Paint Claims Arose From the Same Occurrence

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury recently launched a new version of SDN Search, the search tool for searching its Specially Designated Nationals (“SDN”) and blocked persons list. According to OFAC, the new version of SDN Search provides users with much more leeway when searching for names. For example, SDN Search no longer returns only exact matches. 
Read More New Search Tool Available for Checking the Names of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons Subject to U.S. Sanctions

On March 7, 2013, Washington State’s highest court dealt a blow to liability insurers seeking to recover defense costs for uncovered claims. The court, in a 5-4 decision available here, held that where an insurer elects to defend its insured under a reservation of rights, it cannot force the insured to remit those defense costs if a court later determines that the insurer had no duty to defend. 
Read More The Supreme Court of Washington Holds That an Insurer Cannot Recoup Defense Costs After Defending Under a Reservation of Rights, Notwithstanding a Determination That There is No Coverage

SEQUESTER TO SQUEEZE MEDICARE PAYMENTS
The automatic spending cuts that went into effect on March 1 under the Budget Control Act, also known as the sequester, included 2% cuts to provider payments under the Medicare program. While cuts to other federal agencies were more substantial – an average of 8% – the new Medicare cuts would nonetheless amount to $11 billion over one year, according to the White House, if the sequester lasts that long. 
Read More Healthcare Update: Sequester to Squeeze Medicare Payments; CMS Announces New Participants in Community-Based Care Program

On March 7, 2013, the Florida Senate Banking and Insurance Committee approved SPB 7018 (the “Bill”) by a vote of 11-1. The Bill, if enacted, would make several changes to Florida’s property insurance laws. 
Read More Florida Senate Committee Approves Bill with Sweeping Changes to Property Insurance Laws

As we recently blogged, Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), both of whom sit on the House Financial Services Committee, have introduced a bill to extend the federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Program (the “Program”) through 2019. 
Read More TRIA – Possible Extension Involves Many Unresolved Issues

In comments made yesterday to the Institute of International Bankers conference in Washington, U.S. Treasury undersecretary for domestic finance, Mary J. Miller said she expected FSOC to vote on designation of some companies as systemically important and therefore subject to Federal Reserve oversight “in the next few months.” 
Read More SIFI Designations Expected in the Next Few Months

On February 20, 2013, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that an insurer was required to provide separate counsel to two co-defendants/insureds due to a conflict of interest between them. 
Read More Florida Appellate Court Holds that Insurer Must Provide Separate Counsel to Co-Defendant Insureds