UBS AG and its affiliates (“UBS”) commenced arbitration against Lakah Funding Limited, the primary obligor and issuer of certain Eurobonds, and against four guarantors of the bonds. 


Read More Court Enjoins Arbitrators from Determining Jurisdiction Over Non-Parties to Arbitration Agreement

As reported in our December 8, 2008 posting, the National Association of Inusrance Commissioners (“NAIC”) adopted a proposal to modernize reinsurance regulation (the “Proposal”) at its 2008 Winter Meeting. 


Read More NAIC Exposes Draft Federal Legislation for Implementation of Reinsurance Regulatory Modernization Framework

A New York state appellate court recently reversed a landmark 2007 trial court decision and held that asbestos-related bodily injury claims fall within the products/completed operations hazard coverage of the comprehensive general liability policies at issue and are therefore subject to that coverage’s aggregate limits. 


Read More New York State Appellate Court: Asbestos Claims Fall Within Products/Operations Hazard Coverage and Are Subject to Aggregate Limits

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana recently held that the insureds’ misrepresentation claim against its insurance agent was a viable claim under Indiana law and was distinct from claims that the insurer adjusted their claim in bad faith. 


Read More Indiana Federal Court Recognizes Cause of Action Against Insurance Agent as Distinct From Claims That Insurer Acted in Bad Faith

On January 7, 2009, the Sixth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals held in that, under Kentucky law, an excess liability insurer must show harm or prejudice as a result of late notice of a claim in order to deny coverage on that ground. 


Read More Sixth Circuit: Under Kentucky Law, Excess Insurers Must Show Reasonable Possibility of Substantial Prejudice to Justify Denial of Coverage Based Upon Late Notice

Legislation is under consideration in Connecticut and New Jersey that may significantly expand a claimant’s ability to directly sue an insurer over unfair claims settlement practices. 


Read More Legislation Proposed in Connecticut and New Jersey Allows for Direct Action by Claimants for Unfair Claims Settlement Practices

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently dismissed a securities class action complaint as a sanction for conduct by the lead plaintiff and class counsel.  Guy Del Giudice v. S.A.C. Capital Management, LLC, et al., 06-cv-1413 (February 19, 2009). 


Read More New Jersey Federal Court Dismisses Securities Class Action Complaint as Sanction for Attorney Misconduct

In a recent decision, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that an insurer, in contrast to an insured, cannot obtain attorney’s fees incurred in successfully establishing another insurer’s duty to defend.  John T. Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. Worcester Ins. Co., SJC-10180 (March 19, 2009). 


Read More Supreme Judicial Court Refuses to Extend Gamache Fee-Shifting Rule to Insurer Plaintiffs

Last week, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, (D-W.Va.) introduced the Preexisting Condition Patient Protection Act of 2009 (S. 623) (the “Bill”).  According to Senator Rockefeller, the Bill will address any coverage gaps created in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 regarding preexisting condition exclusions by eliminating the use of preexisting condition exclusions in all health insurance markets. 


Read More Senate Bill Aims to End the Use of Preexisting Condition Exclusions by Health Insurers