The Delaware Chancery Court was recently asked to rule on an issue of first impression: whether a corporation’s duty to advance its executives’ legal bills includes expenses incurred in appealing criminal convictions. 
Read More Delaware Chancery Court To Decide Whether Executives Are Entitled to Advancement of Legal Costs Incurred in Appeals of Criminal Convictions

On 11 June 2008, the All Party Parliamentary Group on Insurance and Financial Services held a meeting focused on consumer insurance law, at which it considered the responses to the Law Commission’s Consultation  Paper (CP) on “Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach of Warranty by the Insured” (See: Press Release: 13 June 2008). Responses were received from consumer groups, academics, brokers and lawyers, as well as from insurers. 
Read More UK: Reforming Consumer Insurance Law

In the case of (1) Ramco Ltd (2) Resource Industries Ltd v Weller Russell & Laws Insurance Brokers Ltd LTL 17/6/2008, David Donaldson QC  held that a broker was liable for failing to obtain “insurance coverage which clearly and indisputably meets its clients’ requirements.” Resource Industries Limited (RIL) was a company which traded in surplus army stock. 


Read More UK: Broker Liable for Failing to Meet Client’s Requirements

A white paper examining the potential impact of climate change on the insurance industry has recently been approved by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (“NAIC”) Climate Change and Global Warming Task Force (the “Task Force”).  The white paper is intended to begin a process of encouraging, or even requiring, insurers to address climate change risk in order to protect consumer and insurer solvency. 
Read More NAIC Considers Climate Change Measures

The United States Supreme Court recently vacated a judgment of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that had held that questions regarding the willfulness of violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act are an issue of fact. 


Read More U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Judgment: Questions Concerning the Willfulness of Fair Credit Reporting Act Violations May Not Be for the Jury

In a recent trial, a jury awarded $21 million to a grocery store chain and its owner against their insurer for the insurer’s unreasonable failure to pay for Katrina-related damages sustained to several of their stores.  The trial in the case of Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire & Casualty Insurance Com, et al., took place in federal court in Louisiana. 


Read More Louisiana Jury Awards $21 million Against Insurer for Katrina Claims