Topic: Tax Related Developments

In a Technical Advice Memorandum (“TAM”) released by the IRS in July, the IRS determined that a large retailer’s purchase of warranty reimbursement policies from a related captive insurance subsidiary that reimburse the retailer for expenses incurred under its manufacturer’s warranty obligations did not constitute an insurable risk for federal tax purposes. 

The Internal Revenue Service announced on February 20, 2008 that it is withdrawing the proposed IRS Regulation §1.1502-13(e)(2)(ii)(C).  The withdrawn regulation would have disallowed as a current deduction for federal income tax purposes any premium payments to an affiliate captive insurer if the captive received as little as 5% of its total premiums from affiliates on the same consolidated tax return. 

In a recently released revenue ruling, the IRS has established procedures for determining if insurance written through protected cell companies constitutes insurance for federal income tax purposes.  This is a result of the previously issued Notice 2005-49, in which the IRS requested comments from the public on this issue.  Concurrently, the IRS issued Notice 2008-19, in which it is requesting comments from the public on guidance regarding the issues that arise if such arrangements actually do constitute insurance.