Topic: D&O Liability

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently broadly applied a so-called “prior and pending litigation” exclusion to limit coverage for the settlement of a lawsuit, finding that many of the lawsuit’s allegations overlapped with allegations made in a lawsuit filed prior to the inception of the policy. 

The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in a case that presents the Court with the opportunity to broaden the class of potential defendants in private securities class actions, which would substantially increase litigation exposure for corporate America.  The questions and comments of the Justices suggest that the majority of the Court is not prepared to alter the current securities class action landscape. 

In a decision dated, September 27, 2007, the Hon. Bernard J. Fried, Commercial Division Justice of the New York Supreme Court for the County of New York, granted in part and denied in part Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the Veras hedge fund families (“Veras Hedge Funds”) in the case captioned Veras Investment Partners, LLC, et al.  v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Index No. 600340/2007. 

Last month, Solicitor General Paul D. Clement filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court siding with non-issuer defendants in a securities class action case. The case, entitled Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, No. 06-43 (U.S. Sup. Ct.), involves securities class action claims brought by shareholders against two third-party suppliers based on certain transactions between those suppliers and the issuer, Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter”).