If outside counsel for a company drafts factual memoranda concerning an internal investigation conducted in response to alleged wrongdoing, and then voluntarily shares the memoranda at the company’s direction with government investigators, has the company waived the work product privilege?  According to a recent decision from a federal district court in New York, the answer is yes. 


Read More Current Issues in D&O and E&O Coverage Investigations: S.D.N.Y. Holds that Credit Suisse Waived Work Product Privilege by Disclosing Internal Investigation Memoranda to the Government

On February 14, 2008, a divided New York Court of Appeals held that a member of a New York limited liability corporation (often referred to simply as a “LLC”) could bring a derivative lawsuit on behalf of the LLC against the entity’s managers. 
Read More NY Court of Appeals Introduces Derivative Liability Exposure to LLC Managers

On February 11, 2008, Judge Colleen Kotelly of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia appointed the Lerach, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins law firm as lead plaintiffs’ counsel in a securities class action arising out of Standard & Poor’s allegedly fraudulent rating of certain bonds collateralized by subprime mortgages. 


Read More D.C. Federal Court Names Lead Counsel in Standard & Poor’s CMO Securities Class Action

Merrill Lynch recently agreed to “make whole” the city of Springfield, Massachusetts by paying nearly $14 million in connection with subprime losses the city suffered in cash accounts held with the brokerage firm. 


Read More Broker Agrees To Reimburse Massachusetts City for $14 Million in Subprime Losses

A joint study conducted by the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse and Cornerstone Research recently  concluded  that   there were 166 securities class action lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide last year.  This is a 43% increase from 2006. 
Read More Recent Study Finds That Securities Class Actions Increased Significantly in 2007 Due to Subprime Crisis

As we reported on here, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v.Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to permit investor suits against third parties who engaged in deceptive acts that contributed to another party’s securities  fraud, where the third parties had no duty to disclose their acts to the public, and where their deceptive acts were in fact not communicated to the public. 
Read More Further Analysis: Supreme Court Limits Securities Fraud Liability of Third Parties

On January 16, 2008, at the end of a two-month trial, a federal jury in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona found that Apollo Group, Inc. (“Apollo”) and two former Apollo executives violated federal securities laws by fraudulently misleading its investors about its recruitment policies. 
Read More $280 Million Securities Class Action Verdict Against Apollo Group