An Indiana federal district court recently granted summary judgment on the ground that an insurer had no duty under a CGL policy to indemnify its insured, a general contractor, in a suit premised on alleged faulty workmanship of the insured’s subcontractors.
Read More Damages Caused To Component Parts By Subcontractors’ Deficient Work Is Not “Property Damage” Caused By An Occurrence”
Coverage & Claims
Insurer to Exclude Nanotube and Nanotechology from Coverage
…
Read More Insurer to Exclude Nanotube and Nanotechology from Coverage
New Jersey Appeals Court Holds Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply to D&O Claim Related to Asbestos Disclosures
Court Finds That Insurer Did Not Waive Defense In Its Denial Letter Due to “Catch-all” Statement
A Pennsylvania state court recently held that an insurer had not waived a defense by failing to specifically reference it in a coverage denial letter because the letter contained a “catch-all” provision reserving the insurer’s rights to raise other coverage defenses and issues. …
Read More Court Finds That Insurer Did Not Waive Defense In Its Denial Letter Due to “Catch-all” Statement
Wisconsin Supreme Court Awards Nearly $1 Million Default Judgment Against Insurer That Failed to Timely Answer
In Otto v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin Inc., 751 N.W.2d 805 (Wisc. 2008), a sharply divided Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed a default judgment entered against an insurer for damages allegedly caused by its co-defendant insureds’ negligence, even though no finding had been made as to the insureds’ liability for the damages at issue. …
Read More Wisconsin Supreme Court Awards Nearly $1 Million Default Judgment Against Insurer That Failed to Timely Answer
Insane Act Can Be “Intentional” for Insurance Coverage Purposes
The Ninth Circuit federal court of appeals recently held that a person can commit an “intentional act” for insurance purposes even if he was criminally insane at the time of the act. …
Read More Insane Act Can Be “Intentional” for Insurance Coverage Purposes
Pennsylvania Federal Court Bars As Untimely Insurers’ Attempt to Join Additional Insurers in Asbestos Coverage Case
Mortgage Broker’s E&O Policy Excludes Coverage for Fraudulent Acts of Its Employee in Connection with Subprime Mortgage Loan Application and Documents
The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the fraud and dishonesty exclusion in an errors and omissions policy issued to a mortgage originator and broker excluded coverage for the fraudulent acts of one of its employees in the loan origination process. …
Read More Mortgage Broker’s E&O Policy Excludes Coverage for Fraudulent Acts of Its Employee in Connection with Subprime Mortgage Loan Application and Documents
Securities Claim Relates Back to Notice of Circumstances Regarding Patent Infringement Suit
False Billing Claims Are Not Covered “Professional Services” Under General Liability Policies
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently held that general liability insurance policies that provide coverage for injuries caused by acts or omission in providing “professional services” do not trigger a duty to defend or indemnify claims for false billing. …
Read More False Billing Claims Are Not Covered “Professional Services” Under General Liability Policies