Read More UK: Court Rules on Deliberate Damage by Policyholder – Porter v Zurich
Coverage & Claims
Post-Hoc Speculation Not Enough to Create “Possibility” of Coverage in Underlying Suit
…
Read More Post-Hoc Speculation Not Enough to Create “Possibility” of Coverage in Underlying Suit
Second Circuit Affirms Decision Granting Excess Insurer Summary Judgment Due to Insured’s Late Notice
UK: Service of Proceedings Out of the Jurisdiction
…
Read More UK: Service of Proceedings Out of the Jurisdiction
UK: The Law Commission Revisits the Illegality Defence
On 26 January 2009 the Law Commission published a Consultation Paper on the long criticised illegality defence. …
Read More UK: The Law Commission Revisits the Illegality Defence
UK: Court of Appeal Rules that Cover Terminates on a Material Change of Facts Stated in Proposal Form
In Qayyum Ansari v New India Assurance Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 93 the Court of Appeal considered Qayyum Ansari’s (Ansari) appeal against the decision at first instance that Ansari’s claim under his insurance policy with New India Assurance (NIA) should be dismissed. …
Read More UK: Court of Appeal Rules that Cover Terminates on a Material Change of Facts Stated in Proposal Form
UK: Dornoch v Westminster International – Court Declines to Join Primary Layer Insurers to Action by Excess Insurers
Dornoch v Westminster International [2009] EWHC 201 (Admlty) relates the right of marine insurers under the Marine Insurance Act 1906 to take over a vessel after it has become a constructive total loss as the result of a collision. …
Read More UK: Dornoch v Westminster International – Court Declines to Join Primary Layer Insurers to Action by Excess Insurers
UK: Court of Appeal Considers Meaning of “Liable as Damages”
…
Read More UK: Court of Appeal Considers Meaning of “Liable as Damages”
Duke University and Its Insurer Dispute Whether Insurer is Liable for Defense Costs and Indemnification Relating to Duke Lacrosse Rape Case and Settlements
On November 24, 2008, Duke University and its affiliate, Duke University Health Systems, Inc. (“DUHS”; collectively with Duke University, “Duke”) filed a federal action alleging that Duke’s insurer had acted in bad faith and breached its contractual duty to advance and pay Duke’s defense costs, to indemnify Duke, and to pay settlements agreed to by Duke in connection with various claims and lawsuits arising from the indictment of three members of the Duke University 2005-2006 men’s lacrosse team (the “Duke Three”) on charges of sexual assault. …
Read More Duke University and Its Insurer Dispute Whether Insurer is Liable for Defense Costs and Indemnification Relating to Duke Lacrosse Rape Case and Settlements