A New York appellate court recently held that factual issues should have precluded summary judgment for a subcontractor and its insurer concerning whether they were obligated to provide defense and indemnification to a general contractor pursuant to the subcontract entered into between the general contractor and subcontractor. 

…
Read More New York Appellate Court: Question of Fact Concerning Additional Insured Obligations Precludes Summary Judgment

A New York appellate court recently held that a coverage action was not rendered merely “academic” by the dismissal of the underlying property damage action because the insured continued to have a claim for litigation expenses incurred in defense of the underlying action. …
Read More New York Appellate Court: Insurer Not Entitled to Dismissal of Coverage Action Just Because Underlying Suit Is Dismissed

In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, Heights at Issaquah Ridge Owners Association v. Steadfast Ins. Co., Case No. C07-1045RSM (W.D.Wa. Dec. 13, 2007), the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to compel an insurer to produce loss reserve information because the plaintiff did not assert how such information would be relevant to its bad faith claim. 

…
Read More Court Rules That Reserve Information and Reinsurance Communications Are Not Relevant to Bad Faith and Consumer Protection Claims

The New York Appellate Division, First Department, recently denied a reinsurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding that an issue of fact existed as to whether a cedent’s allocation of an underlying claim to a reinsured policy was made in bad faith and constituted an ex gratia payment. 

…
Read More New York Court Finds That a Factual Issue Exists as to Whether a Cedent’s Allocation was in Bad Faith and Constitutes an Ex Gratia Payment

In a 9 – 0 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on Wednesday of this week that individual participants in 401(k) retirement plans can sue plan fiduciaries to recover losses that result from mishandling of their individual retirement accounts.  Until the decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., No. 06-856, (Feb. 20, 2008) courts and commentators disagreed over whether an individual account holder could bring an ERISA action against plan fiduciaries or whether only the plan itself had standing to bring those lawsuits. 

…
Read More Supreme Court’s Decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. Could Lead to an Increase in Individual Account Holder 401(k) Litigation

The case of Standard Life Assurance v Oak Dedicated Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 222 concerned an action brought by the insured against its underwriters, who had subscribed to a policy which provided the insured with liability cover of £75million in excess of £25million. The insured claimed an indemnity under the policy, which contained a provision permitting the aggregation of claims arising from one originating cause or source. 

…
Read More English High Court Considers Aggregation Clauses

The FSA’s TCF initiative is a core part of its move to more principle based regulation. It is intended to compel firms to review their treatment of customers and to change their behaviour to deliver improved outcomes for consumers so they believe they are being treated fairly no matter which firm they are dealing with. The aim is for TCF to be embedded within the culture of all firms. 

…
Read More UK: FSA Announces More Help for Small Firms on Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)

A members’ meeting of the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) recently discussed two important Solvency II project’s draft Advices to the European Commission. 

…
Read More EU: CEIOPS Meeting Discusses Draft Advice to European Commission on Key Solvency II Issues

On February 11, 2008, Judge Colleen Kotelly of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia appointed the Lerach, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins law firm as lead plaintiffs’ counsel in a securities class action arising out of Standard & Poor’s allegedly fraudulent rating of certain bonds collateralized by subprime mortgages. 

…
Read More D.C. Federal Court Names Lead Counsel in Standard & Poor’s CMO Securities Class Action

As part of raising the proposed $1 billion Upstate Revitalization Fund in New York Governor Eliot Spitzer’s Executive Budget, Spitzer has requested that surcharges on all automobile policies issued in New York be raised by $15; the current surcharge is $5. 

…
Read More New York Governor Spitzer Proposes Additional $15 Fee On All Auto Policies