Section 83 of this ancient Act gives interested persons the right to demand that insurance money is used to reinstate a building damaged by fire, rather than being paid to the policyholder. 


Read More UK: Law Commission Publishes Memo on Section 83 of the Fires Prevention (Metropolis) Act 1774

The Supreme Court of Texas recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a declaratory judgment action, holding that the allegations in the underlying complaint against its insured did not fall within the coverage provided by the insurance policy.  Pine Oak Builders, Inc. v. Great American Lloyds Ins. Co., No. 06-0867 (Tex. February 13, 2009). 


Read More Supreme Court of Texas Strictly Applies Eight-Corners Rule to Coverage Dispute, Declines to Consider Extrinsic Evidence

The Fifth Circuit recently affirmed a District Court decision holding that coverage for subsidiary “corporations” does not ordinarily include limited liability companies.  American Electric Power Company Inc., et al. v. Affiliated FM Insurance Company, No. 07-31061 (5th Cir. Jan. 21, 2009). 


Read More Fifth Circuit: Coverage for Subsidiary “Corporations” Unambiguously Excludes LLC’s

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that an insurance carrier properly filed an interpleader complaint against policyholders to determine the distribution of $100,000 in life insurance proceeds.  Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hovis, et al., — F.3d –, (3d Cir. Jan. 27, 2009). 


Read More Third Circuit Rules Interpleader Motion by Insurer Proper to Resolve Inheritance Dispute

In (1) James Robert Tucker (2) Jeremy Spratt (Joint Supervisors of Energy Holdings (No 3)(in liquidation) v Gold Fields Mining LLC [2009] EWCA Civ 173 the Joint Supervisors (JS) of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) appealed against a decision that they had wrongly excluded a claim form on the grounds that it had been out of time. 


Read More UK: Court of Appeal Considers Time Limits for Submitting Claims in a CVA

The federal district court for the district of New Jersey recently denied an insured’s motion for reconsideration of its prior award of summary judgment in favor of its insurer.  Pine Belt Automotive, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co., et al., Civil Action. No. 06-5995 (D.N.J. Feb. 19, 2009). 


Read More District Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Insurer in Employee Theft Case

An Illinois federal district court recently granted an insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a declaratory judgment suit regarding coverage for claims related to bacteria.  AMCO Ins. Co. v. Swagat Group, LLC, et al., No. 07-3330 (C.D.Ill. Feb. 10, 2009). 


Read More Federal Court in Illinois Grants Judgment on the Pleadings in Legionnaire’s Disease Coverage Suit Based On Insureds’ Lack of Denial That Policy Contained Bacteria Exclusion

The National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”), which was set to expire this month, has been extended through September of this year as part of the omnibus appropriations bill signed into law by President Obama on March 11. 


Read More National Flood Insurance Program Extended Through September 2009

California’s Court of Appeal for the Fourth District has held that an insured is entitled to stack policy limits of all applicable policies when there is a continuous loss spanning multiple policy periods and policy provides for payment of “all sums” that insured becomes liable to pay, State of California v. Continental Insurance Company. 


Read More Stringfellow Decision: Split in California Appellate Courts on Stacking of Policy Limits Across Policy Periods

We reported last week on the publication of the de Larosière Report on financial supervision in the EU (you can see that post by clicking here). The European Commission has now published its own proposals for radical reform of the regulatory and supervisory regime in Europe. 


Read More European Commission Responds to de Larosière Report