In Equitable Members Action Group v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2009] EWHC 2495 (Admin), the claimant action group, comprising of current and former policyholders of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (the Society), applied for a Judicial Review of HM Treasury’s rejection of certain findings by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman). 


Read More UK: Judicial Review Granted as HM Treasury Found to Have Acted with Injustice and Maladministration

In Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd, the Court of Appeal considered the combined effect of the House of Lords’ decisions in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services and Barker v Corus and section 3 of the Compensation Act 2006 on liability for mesothelioma claims. 
Read More UK: Court of Appeal Decision Demonstrates the Wide Applicability of the “Fairchild” Exception for Mesothelioma Claims

The Law Commission has now published the responses it has received to Issues Paper 5 “Reforming Insurance Contract Law: Micro-businesses”, published in April 2009. The Issues Paper asked whether micro-businesses should be treated like consumers for the purposes of pre-contractual information and unfair terms. 


Read More UK: Publication of Responses to Law Commissions’ Proposals Concerning Micro-Businesses

In December 2008, Michael Foot (formerly of the Bank of England, the FSA and the Central Bank of the Bahamas) was appointed by the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer to identify the opportunities and challenges facing the British Crown Dependencies (Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey) and six Overseas Territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar, Turks and Caicos Islands). 


Read More UK: Foot Report on British Offshore Financial Centres Published

In a judgment handed down last week, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Mr Justice Blackburne (previously reported here) that the English courts have no jurisdiction to sanction the proposed scheme of arrangement for Lehman Brothers International Europe (LBIE) insofar as it purports to extinguish rights of beneficiaries under trusts. 


Read More UK: Court of Appeal Confirms that English Courts have no Jurisdiction to Sanction Lehman Brothers Scheme

In Wickham Van Eyck (a firm) v Norwich Union Insurance Limited [2009] EWCH 2625 (Comm), the High Court held that the defendant insurer was bound to indemnify the claimant firm of architects under the terms of an insurance policy in respect of a dispute between the claimant and another firm of architects. 


Read More UK: Court Refuses to Imply Concept of Dominant Purpose into Insurance Policy Wording

Insurers of solicitors’ firms that have been intervened by the Law Society are not entitled to search through all the Law Society’s documents for evidence that would enable them to refuse an indemnity, the High Court has ruled. 
Read More UK: High Court Refuses to Give Insurer Access to a Firm’s Intervention Documents Held by the Law Society

On 16 October 2009, Mr Justice Norris released his reasoning for sanctioning the transfer of the long-term insurance business of Commercial Union Life Assurance Company Limited (Commercial Union), CGNU Life Assurance Limited (CGNU) and Norwich Union Life (RBS) Limited (Norwich Union) to Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited (Aviva) under Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). 


Read More UK: Insurance Business Transfer Approved by Court as not Improper or Unfair to Policyholders