In the case of Standard Life Assurance Ltd v ACE European Ltd & 10 ORS [2012] EWHC 104 (Comm), Mr Justice Eder held that Standard Life Assurance Limited (SLAL) was entitled to recover under its professional indemnity insurance policies (the Policies) from the defendant insurers (the Insurers) in respect of remediation payments made following a significant fall in value of the Standard Life Pension Sterling Fund (the Fund).
Read More UK: Insured Entitled to Recover “Mitigation Costs” From Professional Indemnity Insurers
United Kingdom
Employers’ Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation – Supreme Court decision expected imminently
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Employers’ Liability (EL) Insurance “Trigger” Litigation is expected imminently. It is not just insurers who eagerly await that decision. …
Read More Employers’ Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation – Supreme Court decision expected imminently
What’s Really Driving the Rising Cost of Car Insurance?
Motor insurers are being heavily criticised by British politicians and consumer organisations. The complaints vary, but there’s a common theme: premiums are rising steeply, that is unacceptable and it’s got to stop. …
Read More What’s Really Driving the Rising Cost of Car Insurance?
UK: Arbitration: English High Court Upholds Anti-Suit Injunction in Favour of Arbitration Proceedings
In Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWHC 42 (Comm), Mr Justice Cooke held that an anti-suit injunction restraining the defendant insureds from pursuing proceedings in Brazil in breach of an arbitration clause would be continued. …
Read More UK: Arbitration: English High Court Upholds Anti-Suit Injunction in Favour of Arbitration Proceedings
UK: FSA Details Planned “Shadow Split”
On 6 February 2012, Hector Sants, CEO of the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) explained in a speech to the British Bankers’ Association that on 2 April 2012 the FSA will be split into the Prudential Group (shadowing the future Prudential Regulation Authority) and the Conduct Group (shadowing the future Financial Conduct Authority). …
Read More UK: FSA Details Planned “Shadow Split”
UK: Motor Insurers’ Bureau Cannot Guarantee Future Unsatisfied Payments of Road Traffic Accident Damages
In Anthony Nathaniel Bennett v. Leonard John Stephens and Zenith Insurance Company [2012] EWHC 1 (QB), the Court was asked to consider the effect of a consent order (the Consent Order) between the parties and the reinsurer of Zenith, Faraday Underwriting Ltd (Faraday). …
Read More UK: Motor Insurers’ Bureau Cannot Guarantee Future Unsatisfied Payments of Road Traffic Accident Damages
UK: Financial Services Bill Published
On 27 January 2012, the Government published the Financial Services Bill, which will fundamentally transform financial regulation in the United Kingdom. …
Read More UK: Financial Services Bill Published
UK: Court Rules on the Materiality of Non-Disclosures, and the Meaning of “Want of Due Diligence” in a Marine Policy
In the case of (1) Sealion Shipping Limited (2) Toisa Horizon Inc v Valiant Insurance Co [2012] EWHC 50 (Comm), Mr Justice Blair held that a marine insurer could not avoid liability for machinery breakdown under a loss of hire policy. …
Read More UK: Court Rules on the Materiality of Non-Disclosures, and the Meaning of “Want of Due Diligence” in a Marine Policy
UK: High Court Confirms That Bringing Appeals of Fact Disguised as Appeals of Law Under s.69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 Will Not be Entertained
In Mary Harvey v. Motor Insurers’ Bureau (QBD (Merc) (Manchester), Claim No: 0MA40077, 21 December 2011), the High Court held that it was not appropriate to grant leave to appeal an arbitrator’s decision that the victim of a road traffic accident was not entitled to compensation for personal injury under s.69 the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) (s.69 of the Act only allows appeals to be made where the arbitrator has made some error of law). …
Read More UK: High Court Confirms That Bringing Appeals of Fact Disguised as Appeals of Law Under s.69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 Will Not be Entertained
UK: Court of Appeal Confirms Order of Attachment in Insurance Tower With Top and Drop Policy
The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the wording of a “top and drop” excess insurance policy did not affect the order in which liability attaches under a tower of insurance. …
Read More UK: Court of Appeal Confirms Order of Attachment in Insurance Tower With Top and Drop Policy